Wednesday,+September+7

__Present__ T. Hartman E. Albers Entire first grade team A. Cruz (for a few minutes)

1. How are interventions going? Hensley -needs to adjust her work because she has 3 kids higher than the rest. Everyone else is good. All agreed we need to work on kids transitioning to each room. Ledezma -Saenz used the dice for letter recognition and the students didn't do well with it.

We were asked if there was any luck finding the missing pieces of kit by Hartman, but answer was no. No one is sure where they are. Hartman asked for someone to contact Mrs. Augustine, Stephenson, and Morales to see if they took them by mistake thinking they were part of the C-Scope materials.

2.Mini Assessment Results-Everyone had a few kids who mastered the assessment

Ledezma- 5 with no G recognition, 2 with no H recognition, 2 with no W recognition Grimes -all knew the letters, trouble with the U sound Kaiser -trouble with the E and G Hensley -trouble with deleting initial sounds Gonzalez -couple that make J sound for G, make CH for H sound, and trouble with W Hayes -trouble deleting final sounds

Continue to plan for interventions. Some students were moved to a new group if they had mastered the focus.

3. Jobs change next week. 4. Albers discussed on Summers behalf formative vs summative assessments. We read strategy 2: use examples and models of strong and weak work Hartman suggested we switch work between classes VS showing work within our own class so that all work remains anonymous. Hartman then gave everyone a peanut and Albers did a peanut target demonstration by moving trash can so we couldn't hit it and then held it still so we could. We read strategy 3: offer descriptive feedback. Albers told us to keep the manilla folder with articles in it and label it PLC so we could add to it.

5. Love and Logic Discussion We don't have to correct behavior right away,it can wait. Kids go extra mile for teachers they love, or most kids do.

For next week bring TPRI data and read chapter 3 in love and logic. We will change groupings based on TPRI data. Someone needs to bring snacks, and it was suggested the time keeper be in charge of snacks also.